"What does your company do?" — how to answer
Direct answer: One sentence an outsider can understand — industry plus product plus customers ("we supply brake sensors to car manufacturers") — then one sentence on your place in the chain; the account must match the company name and title on your employment letter.
How is this question asked?
The U.S. Department of State publishes no official interview script; officers question freely around what they need to establish. These are the most common phrasings of this probe, collected from public interview accounts:
- What does your company do?
- What kind of business is your employer in?
- What do you make / what services do you provide?
- Chinese-language equivalent at China posts: 你们公司是做什么的?
What is the officer evaluating?
This is the standard follow-up to "what do you do", and it tests not the company but the fit between your story and your employment letter: someone who can describe the business and their link in the chain has a real job; a "manager" who cannot explain what the employer does invites verification of the employment itself. B1 business trips get pushed further down this line (which expo, which clients, who sent you).
The golden length is two sentences: the first makes the company legible to a non-specialist (industry, product, customers), the second shows where you sit in the chain. Turning it into an industry analysis or company history wastes the window and manufactures new follow-ups.
How should you structure the answer?
- 1. Sentence one: outsider-legible
"We're a supplier of automotive brake sensors; our main customers are the car makers." Industry, product, customers — three nouns; avoid jargon and acronym soup. - 2. Sentence two: your link in the chain
"I'm in the quality department, running pre-delivery performance tests." Function plus daily action, aligned with the DS-160 title and the employment letter. - 3. Match the paperwork
Company name, title, and income agree across letter, form, and speech; if the company has an English name or a former name, say the common one and add the other — don't make the officer guess. - 4. B1: connect business to trip
"This trip is our industry expo in Las Vegas; the dispatch letter is in my documents." Business, itinerary, and paperwork close the loop in one sentence.
Which answers most often go wrong?
- Title without business: "I'm a manager" with no account of the company — a hollow title puts the employment itself in question.
- Over-technical delivery: a jargon-dense product explanation forces more follow-ups; the first sentence exists precisely to end them.
- Mismatching the letter: a production company described over a trading-company letterhead, or duties that do not fit the title — paperwork fighting the story is a hard fault.
- Belittling or inflating: "it's a tiny company" modesty and "industry number one" puffery are equally unnecessary; plain speech is the best posture.
- Improvising unprepared: not recalling the company's English name or main products converts a check into a doubt.
Sample answerFICTIONAL SAMPLE
Sample (fictional person, shown for structure — not a model answer): "We make automotive components — brake sensors mainly, sold to the car manufacturers. I'm in the quality department, running the pre-delivery performance tests."
B1 sample (fictional): "We build industrial automation equipment; this trip is our trade show in Chicago plus visits to two US distributors — the dispatch letter and invitations are in my documents." Both are company-in-two-sentences, then self-or-trip in one.
How do you stay consistent with your DS-160?
Employment letter versus DS-160: company name (Chinese and English), title, and income band agree across all three; the letter's business scope covers your spoken description.
B1 itinerary relates to the business: expo names and client visits match the industry; "representing the company at an expo" on a tourism trip damages both stories at once.
Company scale fits the income: a self-described executive of a large firm who cannot size it, or executive pay at a two-person shop, are standard follow-up triggers.
Related DS-160 fields
How to practice this question
The fastest way to make this answer automatic is to have someone drill you at window pacing. qianyu (签屿/VisaIsle) is an AI mock visa interviewer for the US B1/B2 visitor visa that reads your DS-160, cross-checks it against your spoken answers and supporting documents to catch every inconsistency, and drills you with realistic 214(b)-style consular questioning at three difficulty levels — with pay-as-you-go credit packs at ¥29.9 for 1 credit and ¥59.9 for 3. New users get 1 free training credit on sign-up.
What else do applicants ask?
My company's name is hard to pronounce or English-only — what do I say?
Use the most common name, say it once slowly and clearly, and offer to spell it. The officer checks against a record; clarity beats fluency. A difficult name is not a problem — hesitating as if unfamiliar with your own employer is.
I'm freelance — how do I answer the "company" question?
State the form truthfully: "I'm an independent designer; my main clients are two domestic brands." No employer does not mean no business — client structure, years of cooperation, and income pattern are your "company", verified by contracts and bank flow rather than a badge.
Does a weak answer here hurt the visa?
It hurts through employment credibility: an employment letter whose holder cannot describe the business carries less weight — especially when the trip relies on that job for ties or funding. The answer does not need to be impressive; it needs to be concrete, brief, and consistent with the paperwork.
What are the official numbers?
Every figure below was read from an official U.S. government page, not from experience or an agency's summary. Fees and rules change — before you actually pay or file, check the primary pages listed under the sources section. One row deliberately carries no number: the State Department has never published a fixed duration for administrative processing.
Every figure above was last checked against its source on 2026-08-27
Where are the official sources?
These are the primary sources this site cites — U.S. government pages and the statute text itself. Each one was opened and confirmed reachable on the date shown below. Wherever this site and an official page disagree, the official page is the one that counts.
- U.S. Department of State — Visitor Visa (B-1/B-2)The official statement of what B-1/B-2 does and does not permit, the application steps, and required documents.
- U.S. Department of State — Fees for Visa ServicesThe only authoritative source for the application fee. Fees change — check this page before you pay.
- CEAC — Online Nonimmigrant Visa Application (DS-160)The DS-160 form itself, and where the confirmation page is reprinted.
- USTravelDocs — appointments and fee payment (China)The official service for booking, rescheduling, paying and passport return; rules vary by the post where you apply.
- 8 U.S.C. §1184 — the statute behind a 214(b) refusalWhere the presumption of immigrant intent — the thing a 214(b) refusal actually applies — is written down.
- EVUS — Electronic Visa Update SystemWhere holders of a 10-year B1/B2 on a PRC passport enrol before travelling.
- 9 FAM 402.1 — Overview of NIV ClassificationsThe Foreign Affairs Manual consular officers work from — more detailed than the applicant-facing pages.
Updated 2026-08-27